The CGA’s 2025 RG Policy replaces master-licence-era non-enforcement with nine binding obligations. Here’s exactly what self-exclusion, marketing suppression, and behaviour tracking now require.

Peru’s Registro de Personas Prohibidas spans land-based and online channels under Ley 27153 and Ley 31557. Know what operators must verify, when, and the sanctions for non-compliance.

Colombia’s Coljuegos uses cedula identity to enforce a single-account-per-concesionario rule that produces cross-operator self-exclusion as a structural outcome. Here is how it works operationally.

Brazil’s SPA/MF 2.579/2025 mandates operator integration with a federal self-exclusion register via Sigap API. Here’s every verification cadence, autolimit rule, and account-closure obligation you must meet.

B2C licensees holding MGA authorisations must meet specific player protection obligations under Directive 2 of 2018 (V3, January 2023), covering deposit limit frameworks, reality check mechanics, gambling history disclosures, and problem gambling detection. This article sets out the operational requirements and implementation considerations compliance teams need to address.

Multi-brand operators face a structural conflict between the responsible gambling imperative to maintain a unified view of player behaviour and GDPR’s purpose limitation and data minimisation principles. This article maps the lawful basis options, architecture trade-offs, and regulatory expectations from the UKGC and MGA.

Compliance officers and licensing teams operating across multiple jurisdictions need a clear picture of how mandatory cross-operator self-exclusion registers differ in scope, technical integration, and B2B liability. This article compares the UK, Denmark, Sweden, and Germany frameworks at the regulatory text level.

SIFS 2026:3 establishes the binding technical and procedural framework Swedish licensees must follow when querying the Spelpaus national self-exclusion register, with all five provisions taking effect 1 August 2026.