Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego Licence requirements, fees and the Spanish gambling regime
The DGOJ is the national regulator of state-wide online gambling in Spain. Established in 2011 under Law 13/2011 and now sitting under the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, it operates a two-tier general-plus-singular licensing model, runs the national RGIAJ self-exclusion register, supervises the safer gambling environments regime introduced by Royal Decree 176/2023, and has spent 2024 and 2025 issuing the largest enforcement totals in its history. This profile sets out the architecture, the licensing process, what it costs to operate, the obligations that follow, the advertising perimeter (currently in transition after the Supreme Court’s April 2024 ruling), and the supervisory direction that has emerged from the 2024 to 2026 enforcement record.
Who the DGOJ is
The Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego is the national regulator of state-wide gambling activity in Spain. It was established by Law 13/2011 of 27 May 2011, the foundational Spanish Gambling Act that opened the country’s online gambling market to private operators for the first time. The DGOJ today sits within the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, reporting through the General Secretariat for Consumer Affairs and Gambling, and is the authority responsible for the regulation, licensing, supervision, control and sanctioning of all state-level gambling activity in Spain.
The Spanish regulatory architecture has two layers. The DGOJ regulates state-wide online gambling and has national jurisdiction over the products it licenses. Land-based gambling (commercial casinos, bingo halls, slot arcades and the like) is regulated by Spain’s seventeen Autonomous Regions, each of which maintains its own land-based gambling authority. The DGOJ coordinates with the Autonomous Regions and supervises the points where the two regimes meet, but it does not itself license land-based premises. State-owned lottery products are operated by SELAE (Sociedad Estatal de Loterías y Apuestas del Estado) and ONCE (Organización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles); both are inside the broader DGOJ supervisory orbit but operate on a different statutory footing.
The DGOJ’s jurisdiction is national for online and coordinative for land-based. An operator entering Spain to launch online product deals primarily with the DGOJ; a land-based operator deals primarily with the regional gambling authority of the autonomous region in which it sits.
Editorial · drawn from Law 13/2011 and the DGOJ regulatory frameworkGovernance is direct ministerial. The DGOJ is led by a Director General appointed through the Ministry of Consumer Affairs. The Consejo de Políticas del Juego (Gambling Policy Council) coordinates the national framework with the Autonomous Regions, and the DGOJ’s decisions are subject to administrative appeal and, ultimately, to judicial review by Spanish administrative courts. That judicial review is not theoretical: in April 2024 the Supreme Court annulled key parts of the advertising restrictions imposed by Royal Decree 958/2020 on the basis that the underlying primary statute did not provide sufficient legal cover for the executive-level restrictions, a ruling that materially reshaped the Spanish advertising perimeter and that the DGOJ and the Ministry are still working to address through primary legislation.
Operators preparing for Spanish market entry should understand the DGOJ as a national consumer-protection-aligned regulator with a clear statutory remit, an active and rapidly escalating enforcement programme, and a regulatory framework that has been updated repeatedly over the last three years: Royal Decree 958/2020 on advertising, Royal Decree 176/2023 on safer gambling environments, and a Draft Royal Decree (currently in consultation as of 2025) on cross-operator deposit limits and standardised risk-detection.
Source. Ley 13/2011, de 27 de mayo, de regulación del juego (BOE-A-2011-9280); Royal Decree 958/2020 on commercial communications; Royal Decree 176/2023 on safer gambling environments; Supreme Court Ruling 527/2024 (April 2024); DGOJ official portal.
Three statutory functions, three supervisory priorities
Law 13/2011 gives the DGOJ a six-function statutory remit (regulation, licensing, supervision, coordination, control and sanction). In practice the regulator has organised its work around three operating priorities that map cleanly onto the recent enforcement record.
Player protection and harm reduction
The RGIAJ national self-exclusion register, deposit limits under Article 36 of RD 1614/2011, the safer gambling environments framework under RD 176/2023, and the standardised risk-detection mechanism that the DGOJ is rolling out as a mandatory operator obligation in 2025 and 2026.
Integrity, fairness and technical compliance
Pre-launch technical certification of platforms and games, AML supervision under the Spanish Prevention of Money Laundering Act, anti-fraud controls, sport-integrity coordination, and the inspection and audit cycle the DGOJ runs against licensed operators.
Fight against illegal gambling
The €5 million sanction tier with two-year operating bans for unlicensed supply, the domain-blocking regime, the 2026 Polymarket and Kalshi blocking actions, and the coordination with payment providers and platform intermediaries.
What this means in practice. The DGOJ’s enforcement totals confirm where the resources go. The €142 million of total 2024 sanctions and the €111 million through 58 actions in 2025 were dominated by the third priority: illegal operators received the largest individual penalties, typically €5 million per very serious offence plus a two-year operating ban. Licensed operator sanctions are smaller individually (Codere’s €100,000 for a non-compliant Facebook advert; Bet365’s €10,000 for granting bonuses to non-RG-compliant players) but more frequent, and the multi-operator coordinated round of €3.5 million across 26 licensed operators in early 2025 signalled that the regulator is comfortable applying the same supervisory tool across the entire licensed base at once.
General + singular: the two-tier licensing model
Spain uses a two-tier remote-gambling licensing model. An operator first holds a general licence at the operator level, then applies for one or more singular licences at the product level. Both are granted by the DGOJ. Holding only one of the two does not authorise operation.
General licences (operator-level)
A general licence is the operator-level authorisation. It runs to a ten-year term and is renewable. There are three categories of general licence and an operator must hold the appropriate general licence before applying for any singular licence in the products covered by that category.
- Bets
- Apuestas. Covers all forms of betting product, including fixed-odds sports betting, pool betting, exchange betting and horse-race betting.
- Contests
- Concursos. Covers contest-style gambling product, a smaller but distinct category in the Spanish framework.
- Other
- Otros juegos. Covers casino-style and other games: bingo, blackjack, roulette, baccarat, slots, poker, complementary games and the rest of the gaming portfolio.
Singular licences (product-level)
Singular licences are product-level authorisations granted under a general licence. They run to three to five years depending on the product and are also renewable. An operator may hold multiple singular licences under a single general licence; each must be separately applied for and registered.
- Bets
- Fixed-odds betting, fixed-odds sports betting, sports pool betting, fixed-odds horse betting, horse pool betting, exchange betting.
- Casino
- Bingo, blackjack, roulette, baccarat, slots, complementary games.
- Poker
- Cash games and tournaments. Spain is part of a closed pooled-liquidity arrangement with France and Portugal (PESF), which materially improves the player-pool economics for Spanish-licensed poker rooms.
Key point. Spain is unusual in licensing a full casino product set including slots, blackjack, roulette and baccarat, which neighbouring France does not. An operator that holds a Spanish “other games” general licence plus the relevant singular licences can offer a near-complete online-casino product to Spanish residents. That is one of the reasons Spain is a significant European market for large operators, and one of the reasons the DGOJ’s enforcement focus on illegal supply matters: an unlicensed offshore operator targeting Spanish players competes with a real licensed alternative.
From general-licence tender to live, in five stages
A general licence application depends on the timing of a public tender by the DGOJ; once a tender window opens, applicants follow a five-stage process. A clean application typically reaches live operation in four to nine months for the general licence and an additional one to two months for each singular licence.
Confirm an open general-licence tender window, prepare the entity (Spanish or EEA establishment).
mo 0Submit corporate, financial, AML, technical-architecture and beneficial-ownership documentation. €2 m financial guarantee posted.
mo 1 – 4DGOJ-recognised technical certification of the platform, game integrity and reporting interfaces.
mo 3 – 7Apply for each product-level singular licence. One to two months per product once the general is granted.
mo 7 – 9Operator certified and live, RGIAJ integration tested, deposit-limit framework configured, advertising perimeter confirmed.
mo 8 – 10Modest licence fees, heavy GGR tax, large financial guarantee
The headline DGOJ fee line is modest by European standards. The structural cost of operating in Spain sits in the GGR tax (20 percent), the financial-guarantee requirement, and the annual operating levy. For a meaningful-scale operator the GGR tax dwarfs every other line.
The cost stack at a glance
- General-licence application. Approximately €38,000 in technical-report fees plus €10,000 per gambling licence, payable on the general application.
- Singular-licence registration. €2,500 per singular licence registered under the general.
- Financial guarantee. €2 million on entry, reduced to a minimum of €1 million from year two and recalibrated against gross gaming revenue. The guarantee secures operator liabilities to players and the State.
- GGR tax. 20 percent standard rate; 10 percent for operators registered in Ceuta or Melilla. This is the dominant cost line for any meaningful-scale operator.
- Annual operating levy. 0.75 per thousand (0.075%) of gross operating revenue paid annually to the DGOJ for the regulator’s operating costs.
- Health levy. A 2 percent levy on GGR funds public-health and harm-prevention initiatives. Players do not see the levy directly; it is paid by the operator.
An operator should model the cost line as a two-part stack. The fixed regulatory cost is modest: under €100,000 in year-one application, certification and registration fees on a typical multi-product application, plus the €2 million financial-guarantee tie-up. The variable cost is large: 20 percent GGR tax (or 10 percent under the Ceuta/Melilla regime) plus the small 0.075 percent DGOJ administrative fee on gross operating revenue. For a high-GGR operator, the Spanish total tax-and-levy load on operating revenue runs at roughly 20 percent of GGR, materially lower than the post-April-2026 UK Remote Gaming Duty (40 percent plus the 1.1 percent statutory levy) and higher than Malta’s current 5 percent gaming-tax line (rising to 10–15 percent under the 1 October 2026 reform).
Source. Law 13/2011, articles on licensing fees; Real Decreto 1614/2011 on licensing; DGOJ Fees Order (annual); Ley 22/2009 (gambling tax framework as amended).
Core operator obligations
DGOJ obligations on licensed operators flow from Law 13/2011, the implementing decrees, the technical regulation and a sequence of supervisory resolutions issued under the Director General’s rule-making powers. The map below is non-exhaustive but covers the supervisory perimeter that drives the bulk of compliance work.
Key takeaways
- Mandatory RGIAJ integration. Operators must verify every account against the national self-exclusion register before account opening and on a continuing basis. The Bet365 sanction in 2024 followed a failure in the related bonus-eligibility check.
- Deposit limits per Article 36, RD 1614/2011. Operators must offer daily, weekly and monthly deposit-limit tools at the account level. The cross-operator deposit cap (the 2025 Draft Royal Decree) will add a voluntary aggregate ceiling on top.
- Safer gambling environments under RD 176/2023. Operators must apply the standardised risk-detection mechanism the DGOJ is finalising and apply the prescribed protective measures when a player is flagged as a "risk player".
- AML programme under the Spanish PMLA. Licensed operators are subject persons; SEPBLAC (the Spanish FIU) receives suspicious-activity reports.
- Technical certification and operational reporting. Pre-launch certification of platforms by DGOJ-recognised testing labs, real-time event reporting to the regulator, and a recurring inspection and audit cycle.
Identity and account opening
KYC is required before any deposit or play. Operators verify against the national identity infrastructure and against the RGIAJ in a single workflow. Anonymous play is not permitted; all accounts are linked to a verified DNI or NIE.
Technical conditions
The DGOJ’s technical regulation (Reglamento Técnico) sets the system, security and reporting floor. Operators must maintain certified random number generation, secure data hosting (with Spanish localisation for designated record categories), real-time transaction reporting to the regulator, and pre-launch certification by an approved testing lab.
Reporting and supervisory engagement
Operators file monthly and quarterly returns to the DGOJ on revenue, player activity, RG metrics and AML exposure, notify key events (changes in ownership, key persons, material technical change), and respond to ad hoc information requests. The DGOJ runs both routine and targeted inspections and audits, and has shown willingness to pursue technical non-compliance as a discrete sanction line (Codere’s €17,500 fine for technical non-compliance is one example).
The RGIAJ integration is the single most heavily supervised obligation on the Spanish market. A failure here triggers attention from the regulator faster than almost any other compliance failing.
Editorial · drawn from the 2024-2025 enforcement recordFor a deeper view of how the Spanish RG framework compares against other European regulators, see our Responsible Gambling Observatory, which sets out the player-protection controls in force across twelve indexed jurisdictions side by side. The full Spanish standards library, indexed at the standard level, is in the DGOJ Standards Explorer.
The advertising perimeter in transition
The Spanish gambling advertising regime is in transition. Royal Decree 958/2020 imposed some of the strictest restrictions in Europe; the Supreme Court’s April 2024 ruling annulled key parts of it; the government is now working to legislate the restrictions back. Operators should treat the current perimeter as unsettled.
What Royal Decree 958/2020 imposed
The 2020 Royal Decree restricted audiovisual gambling advertising to the 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. time slot, banned welcome bonuses targeted at new customers (loyalty bonuses to verified existing customers were still permitted after a thirty-day account age), prohibited sport sponsorship, and restricted the use of celebrities and influencers. Promotion targeted at new customers was forbidden; promotion targeted at existing verified customers was permitted only under tight conditions. The regime was widely cited as among the strictest gambling-advertising frameworks in Europe and was seen as a model by other regulators reviewing their own rules.
What the Supreme Court did in April 2024
In April 2024 the Spanish Supreme Court issued Ruling 527/2024, nullifying key articles of Royal Decree 958/2020 on the basis that the underlying primary statute (Law 13/2011) did not give the executive sufficient legal cover for the breadth of restrictions imposed at decree level. The reversal reinstated welcome bonuses to new customers, celebrity and influencer endorsements, sport sponsorship, and the broader set of digital advertising placements that had been restricted under the 2020 decree.
Where this is heading. The political direction is to put the restrictions back through primary legislation rather than executive decree, which would survive a future judicial challenge. In August 2025 the government signalled renewed work on a welcome-bonus ban. The likely 2026 outcome is a tightening of the regime back toward something close to the 2020 perimeter, but applied through primary law rather than decree. Operators relying on welcome bonuses and celebrity endorsements should treat the current freedom as temporary.
Standing obligations on operators remain: no targeting of minors, no portrayal of gambling as risk-free or as a means of generating income, mandatory responsible-gambling messaging in commercial communications, and operator accountability for affiliate-led promotion. Sanctions on licensed operators in 2024 and 2025 for advertising non-compliance (Codere’s €100,000 Facebook-ad fine being the most-cited example) demonstrate that the regulator continues to enforce against the standing obligations even with the 2020 decree partially annulled.
The RGIAJ, deposit limits and the safer gambling environments regime
Spanish player protection rests on three foundations: the national self-exclusion register (RGIAJ), the deposit-limit regime under Article 36 of Royal Decree 1614/2011, and the safer gambling environments framework introduced by Royal Decree 176/2023, which is in the process of becoming the binding minimum standard for risk-detection across all licensed operators.
The RGIAJ national self-exclusion register
The Registro General de Interdicciones de Acceso al Juego was established under Law 13/2011 and has been operated by the DGOJ since 2015. It is the national self-exclusion register and registration takes effect throughout Spain: any licensed online operator must block access by a registered person, and where the autonomous region requires identity verification at the door of a land-based venue, in-person access is also blocked. Enrolment is immediate; the minimum term is six months before a removal request can be made in person.
The DGOJ has progressively modernised enrolment paths. The web portal at ordenacionjuego.es accepts digital-certificate, Cl@ve PIN and form-based registration; the Stop Juego mobile app, supported by the DGOJ, provides a digital enrolment path that automatically registers the user with the RGIAJ. The register has seen double-digit growth in registrations in recent years as awareness has improved and the digital paths have lowered the friction to enrol.
Deposit limits and the cross-operator cap proposal
Article 36 of Royal Decree 1614/2011 requires every licensed operator to maintain daily, weekly and monthly deposit limits at the account level for each participant. The default limits are operator-set within the regulatory floor; players can lower the limits themselves and the operator must honour reductions in real time. Increases are subject to a cooling-off window.
The 2025 Draft Royal Decree amending RD 1614/2011 introduces a voluntary cross-operator deposit cap that would allow a player to set a single aggregate ceiling across all licensed operators with whom they hold accounts. The draft is expected to be approved and published in Q3 2025 with a twelve-month transition period before entry into force. The cross-operator cap addresses one of the most-cited Spanish RG gaps: a player who tops up to a per-operator monthly limit at one site can simply move to a second licensed site and start over.
Royal Decree 176/2023 and the standardised risk-detection mechanism
Royal Decree 176/2023 of 14 March establishes the safer gambling environments framework and assigns the DGOJ responsibility for developing a mandatory standardised mechanism for detecting risky gambling behaviour. The 2025 Draft Resolution published by the DGOJ sets out the common criteria and thresholds operators will use to flag a "risk player": indicators include excessive spending, large wins or losses in a defined period, prolonged gaming sessions, sustained activity over consecutive days, and behavioural patterns that suggest loss of control. When the mechanism becomes mandatory, every licensed operator will apply the same detection methodology and trigger the protective measures prescribed by RD 176/2023 to the flagged player.
Enforcement record
DGOJ enforcement totals have escalated dramatically over the last two years. The €142 million combined-2024 figure is an order of magnitude larger than the regulator’s historical run-rate; the €111 million across 58 separate actions in 2025 confirms the trajectory. The bulk of the financial total goes to unlicensed-supply sanctions; licensed-operator fines are smaller individually but more frequent and have become a routine supervisory tool.
Selected DGOJ enforcement activity · 2024 → 2025
Three patterns stand out across the 2024 and 2025 record. First, the financial total is dominated by very-serious-offence sanctions on unlicensed supply. The €5 million fine plus two-year operating ban is the DGOJ’s standard penalty for offering gambling without a Spanish licence to Spanish residents, and the regulator has shown willingness to apply it across multiple operators in a single sanction round. Second, licensed-operator sanctions are now a routine supervisory tool rather than a rare event. The €3.5 million coordinated round across 26 licensed operators in early 2025 confirmed that the regulator will use the same mechanism against the licensed base when a thematic compliance failing is identified. Third, the perimeter is extending to novel product types: the 2026 Polymarket and Kalshi blocking actions targeted prediction-market platforms operating without a Spanish gambling licence, a product type the regulator has formally treated as gambling and therefore as subject to the same supply restrictions as more traditional unlicensed casino or sportsbook offerings.
Source. DGOJ press releases (H1 2024, H2 2024, 2025 sanction rounds); IMGL Magazine Vol. 3 No. 1 (Spanish gambling regulation update); DLA Piper analysis of 2025 illegal-operator sanctions; iGaming Business coverage of the 2026 Polymarket and Kalshi blockings.
Reforms and what comes next
The Spanish framework has been in active reform since 2020. Three vectors will define the next eighteen months: the advertising perimeter rebuild, the cross-operator deposit cap, and the standardised risk-detection mechanism becoming mandatory.
Law 13/2011 enacted Foundational
The Spanish Gambling Act opens the online market to private operators, establishes the DGOJ as the national regulator, and sets the statutory framework that every subsequent decree builds on.
RGIAJ national self-exclusion register goes live
The DGOJ formally launches the national self-exclusion register required by Law 13/2011; operator integration becomes a mandatory condition of licensure.
Royal Decree 958/2020 on commercial communications Material
Among the strictest gambling advertising frameworks in Europe at the time: welcome-bonus ban, 1 a.m.–5 a.m. audiovisual window, sponsorship prohibition, celebrity and influencer restrictions.
Royal Decree 176/2023 on safer gambling environments RG
Establishes the safer gambling environments framework, assigns the DGOJ responsibility for the mandatory standardised risk-detection mechanism, and introduces a common-minimum player-protection standard across all licensed operators.
Supreme Court Ruling 527/2024 Material
Spanish Supreme Court annuls key articles of Royal Decree 958/2020 for lack of legal cover in the underlying primary statute. Welcome bonuses, celebrity endorsements and digital placements reinstated pending legislative response.
Record enforcement totals Enforcement
DGOJ imposes approximately €142 million in combined H1 and H2 sanctions, dominated by very-serious-offence fines on unlicensed supply. The largest single-year enforcement total in the regulator’s history.
Standardised risk-detection draft published
The DGOJ publishes a Draft Resolution setting out the common criteria and thresholds for the mandatory risk-detection mechanism under RD 176/2023. Operator implementation expected through 2026.
Cross-operator deposit cap (Draft RD)
Draft Royal Decree amending RD 1614/2011 introduces a voluntary cross-operator deposit-cap mechanism. Twelve-month transition period before entry into force; political signals point toward eventual mandatory expansion.
Polymarket & Kalshi blocked Live
DGOJ blocks the prediction-market platforms Polymarket and Kalshi over unauthorised gambling supply to Spanish residents. Confirms the regulator’s position that prediction markets fall within the gambling perimeter and require Spanish licensure.
Looking ahead. Three vectors dominate the next eighteen months. First, the advertising perimeter: a primary-legislation rebuild of the welcome-bonus and sponsorship restrictions is expected through 2026 and into 2027, with the perimeter likely tightening back toward (and possibly beyond) the 2020 decree level once it has primary-law cover. Second, the standardised risk-detection mechanism becoming a mandatory operator obligation under RD 176/2023, with significant implementation work for operators that have relied on bespoke models. Third, the cross-operator deposit cap moving from voluntary to mandatory, which will require new technical infrastructure to enforce caps across all licensed operators in real time. Operators planning two or three years ahead should assume the framework will keep tightening rather than settle.
How the DGOJ compares
The DGOJ sits in the European consumer-protection tradition alongside the UKGC and the ANJ, but it has its own architectural shape: a two-tier general-plus-singular licensing model that is unusual in Europe, a full casino product perimeter that France does not allow, and one of the largest enforcement totals in the licensed gambling sector despite a regulator that is much smaller than the UKGC by headcount.
| Dimension | DGOJ · Spain | UKGC · United Kingdom | MGA · Malta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | National regulator; two-tier general + singular licence | Point-of-consumption, open market | EU hub, open market |
| Online casino | Licensed (singular per-product) | Licensed | Licensed |
| Headline tax / duty on GGR | 20% GGR tax (10% Ceuta/Melilla) + 0.075% DGOJ admin fee (Model 602). No mandatory RG/health GGR levy. | 40% Remote Gaming Duty from Apr 2026 + 1.1% statutory levy | 5% gaming tax on Maltese-resident revenue (rising 1 Oct 2026: Type 1 casino to 15%; Types 2/3/4 to 10%) |
| Financial guarantee | €2m on entry, reducible to €1m from year 2 | None equivalent | Operator-level capital requirements |
| Self-exclusion | RGIAJ (national, mandatory, cross-channel) | GAMSTOP (national, mandatory) | Operator-level register |
| Advertising perimeter | In transition post Supreme Court April 2024 ruling; rebuild expected | Athlete ban, minor-appeal restrictions, no inducement advertising | Commercial communications guidelines; lighter prescription |
| Enforcement posture | Very active; €142m total 2024, €111m in 58 actions 2025 | Aggressive; record £19.2m (William Hill, 2023) | Step change in 2025 (€2.8m) |
Frequently asked questions
Do I need both a general and a singular DGOJ licence to operate in Spain?
Yes. The Spanish regime is two-tier. A general licence (one of three categories: bets, contests, or other games) is the operator-level authorisation. A singular licence is the product-level authorisation that lets the operator actually offer a specific product, such as slots, blackjack, roulette, poker, bingo or fixed-odds sports betting. A single general licence holder can hold multiple singular licences. Both are granted by the DGOJ and both must be in place before any product can launch.
How much does it cost to apply for a DGOJ licence?
The visible regulatory line is approximately €38,000 in technical-report fees on the general licence, €10,000 per gambling licence, and €2,500 per singular licence registered. Operators must also post a financial guarantee of €2 million on entry, reducible to €1 million from year two as the guarantee recalibrates against gross gaming revenue. The annual operating cost is dominated by the 20 percent GGR tax (10 percent for operators registered in Ceuta and Melilla) plus a 0.75-per-thousand DGOJ administrative fee (Tasa por la gestión administrativa del juego, Model 602) on gross operating revenue. Spain has no mandatory percentage-of-GGR responsible-gambling or health levy under Law 13/2011.
What is the RGIAJ and how does it differ from operator-level self-exclusion?
The Registro General de Interdicciones de Acceso al Juego is Spain's national self-exclusion register, established under Law 13/2011 and operated by the DGOJ since 2015. A registered person is blocked from access at every licensed online operator in Spain and, where the autonomous region requires identity verification at the door, from in-person venues as well. Enrolment takes effect immediately and the minimum term is six months before a removal request can be made in person. The Stop Juego mobile app, supported by the DGOJ, provides a digital enrolment path on top of the web-based and paper routes.
Are welcome bonuses still banned in Spain?
Not currently. In April 2024 the Spanish Supreme Court issued Ruling 527/2024 nullifying key articles of Royal Decree 958/2020 on the basis that the underlying primary law did not provide sufficient cover for the executive-level restrictions. The reversal reinstated welcome bonuses to new customers, celebrity and influencer endorsements, and a broader set of digital advertising placements. The political and regulatory direction is to legislate the restrictions back into the regime through primary law; in August 2025 the government signalled renewed work on a welcome-bonus ban. Operators should treat the current advertising perimeter as in transition rather than settled.
Is the DGOJ a strict enforcement regulator?
Increasingly so, and at scale. In 2024 the DGOJ imposed total sanctions of approximately €142 million across multiple enforcement rounds, with thirteen operators receiving €5 million fines each plus two-year operating bans for "very serious" offences targeted overwhelmingly at illegal supply. 2025 added approximately €111 million through 58 separate actions, including a €33.5 million round on 32 serious regulatory breaches plus six site blockings. Licensed operators have also been sanctioned at lower levels, including Codere for advertising and technical non-compliance and Bet365 for granting bonuses to non-responsible-gambling-compliant players. The 2026 Polymarket and Kalshi blocking actions signalled the regulator's willingness to extend the perimeter to novel product types.
Key resources
Track every Spanish rule change as it happens
The advertising perimeter rebuild, the cross-operator deposit cap and the standardised risk-detection mechanism are all moving in 2026. Explore the European regulator profiles in depth and compare jurisdictions side by side.