Live enforcement map · Last 12 months · Updated 28 Sep 2026
Map unavailable. The list below still works.
MGM Resorts International failed to timely file a Principal Licensing application with the Board.
MGM Resorts International failed to timely file a Principal Licensing application with the Board.
CountR GmbH underwent an unapproved change of control of its licence and failed to pay required licensing fees.
Commission enquiries revealed anti-money laundering failings at the operator.
The operator failed to notify the regulator within 14 days of a change in its circle of persons with significant influence (key persons/ownership).
The MGA suspended the operator's authorisation on grounds set out in the Gaming Compliance and Enforcement Regulations, without specifying the underlying breaches in detail.
Those responsible for the website stakes.com offered gambling to Swedish consumers without holding the required Swedish licence.
The Commission suspended the operator's licence after enquiries revealed suspected social responsibility and anti-money laundering failings.
The Commission suspended the operator's licence after enquiries revealed suspected social responsibility and anti-money laundering failings.
NorthStar Gaming failed to apply its own anti-money laundering controls, not classifying a player with a high-risk disclosed occupation as high risk, not conducting enhanced due diligence or verifying source of funds after the player exceeded the $25,000 deposit threshold, and not escalating interventions despite money laundering risk indicators.
A Commission compliance assessment and investigation found anti-money laundering and social responsibility failures, including ineffective controls to identify customers at risk of gambling harm and inadequate source of funds and suspicious activity reporting checks.
Supervision found shortcomings in the information provided on physical lottery tickets and in compliance with technical requirements.
Supervision found shortcomings in the information provided on physical lottery tickets and in compliance with technical requirements.
Supervision found shortcomings in the information provided on physical lottery tickets and in compliance with technical requirements.
Supervision found shortcomings in the information provided on physical lottery tickets and in compliance with technical requirements.
Supervision found shortcomings in the information provided on physical lottery tickets and in compliance with technical requirements.
The supplier made prohibited auto-play functionality available to Ontario players on multiple slot games and failed to properly configure, test and monitor its games before and after launch.
Read case →The MGCB executed a search warrant and seized suspected illegal slot-style machines and proceeds after receiving a tip that the bar was operating unlicensed gaming machines and paying winnings in cash and gift cards.
The content creator operated and marketed a promotional game of chance to the public via Instagram without the required authorisation from Coljuegos.
The operator failed to participate in a multi-operator self-exclusion scheme as required for land-based gambling premises, a consumer-protection measure to reduce gambling harm.
The Director fined Hard Rock Digital for breaching regulations governing the creation of Internet gaming accounts.
Caesars Sportsbook was penalised for violating New Jersey regulations concerning responsible gaming.
Failures in Betty Gaming's age-verification and player eligibility controls allowed underage individuals to create accounts and, in several cases, deposit funds and gamble on Betty.ca.
Resorts violated New Jersey casino accounting control regulations.
The operator's money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment and related policies, controls and customer due diligence were inadequate, so it failed to detect that its games were being supplied to consumers in Great Britain via six unlicensed websites.
The casino agreed, as part of resolving issues surrounding its pending casino licence renewal, to contribute $2 million toward a traffic mitigation project near its Philadelphia location.
The interactive gaming manufacturer failed to properly report or address a material change in its financial status and corporate structure.
AGCO inspectors found prohibited nicotine and erectile dysfunction products on sale at the Kitchener store on two occasions and alleged the registrant obstructed two compliance inspections.
The company offered gambling to Swedish consumers without holding a Swedish gambling licence.
The company offered gambling to Swedish consumers without holding the required Swedish licence.
The operator failed to adequately identify, assess and monitor high-risk patrons and to file required Suspicious Transaction Reports where patrons displayed potential money laundering indicators at Pickering Casino Resort.
The administrative court agreed with the regulator that the company committed serious breaches of anti-money-laundering rules through insufficient customer due diligence measures.
The administrative court agreed with the regulator that the company committed serious breaches of anti-money-laundering rules through insufficient customer due diligence measures.
The administrative court agreed with the regulator that the company committed serious breaches of anti-money-laundering rules through insufficient customer due diligence measures.
The Commission found social responsibility failures in Petfre's policies and procedures, including inadequate automated identification of markers of harm and delayed customer interactions.
Bally's Interactive was penalized for violating self-exclusion rules.
BetMGM breached self-exclusion rules and failed to honour wagering limits that patrons had set for themselves.
Sporttrade offered wagering on sports events that are prohibited under New Jersey rules.
The company offered gambling to Swedish consumers without holding the required Swedish gambling licence.
Great Canadian Entertainment installed revoked or unapproved bill validator software in gaming machines at four Ontario casinos without the required testing and approval.
Stakelogic ran online slots games faster than the required minimum 2.5 second gap between spins, breaching the Commission's remote technical standards on responsible product design.
The administrative court agreed with Spelinspektionen that the operator had clearly breached its duty of care towards the majority of the reviewed players and therefore upheld the warning and the SEK 12 million sanction fee.
The administrative court found that Roar Vegas had not clearly and distinctly breached the duty of care and therefore annulled Spelinspektionen's decision imposing a reprimand and a SEK 8 million sanction fee.
The platform is alleged to be offering prediction-market betting to users in Spain without the required administrative licence, in breach of Spanish gambling regulations.
The platform is alleged to be offering prediction-market betting to users in Spain without the required administrative licence, in breach of Spanish gambling regulations.
The operator failed to notify the regulator of changes to its circle of qualified persons within the required 14 days on several occasions.
The fantasy contest operator failed to notify the Board and obtain its approval for a change of control of its licence.
The casino failed to follow Know Your Customer guidelines, which led to fraudulent withdrawals of more than $92,000 from iGaming accounts.
Underage individuals were allowed on the gaming floor and to play slot machines or table games on three occasions.
The vendor's registration was administratively revoked for failure to request a hearing, failure to appear, or failure to comply with fingerprint requirements.
The vendor's registration was administratively revoked for failure to request a hearing, failure to appear, or failure to comply with fingerprint requirements.
The vendor's registration was administratively revoked for failure to request a hearing, failure to appear, or failure to comply with fingerprint requirements.
The vendor's registration was administratively revoked for failure to request a hearing, failure to appear, or failure to comply with fingerprint requirements.
The vendor's registration was administratively revoked for failure to request a hearing, failure to appear, or failure to comply with fingerprint requirements.
The vendor's registration was administratively revoked for failure to request a hearing, failure to appear, or failure to comply with fingerprint requirements.
The vendor's registration was administratively revoked for failure to request a hearing, failure to appear, or failure to comply with fingerprint requirements.
The AGCO found that games created by the company were available on unregulated gambling websites accessible to Ontario players, which is prohibited for registered suppliers.
The AGCO found that games created by the company were available on unregulated gambling websites accessible to Ontario players, which is prohibited for registered suppliers.
The operator offered bonuses to Swedish customers on two occasions, although Swedish law only allows a bonus to be offered on the first occasion a player plays one of the licensee's games.
The licensee failed to make required information, such as the licence holder's contact details and responsible gambling information, easily accessible in its bingo hall.
The licensed operator committed a serious infringement of the type listed in article 40 of Law 13/2011 on gambling regulation.
The foreign online gambling operator offered gambling in Spain without holding a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The licensed operator committed a serious infringement of the type listed in article 40 of Law 13/2011 on gambling regulation.
The licensed operator committed a serious infringement of the type listed in article 40 of Law 13/2011 on gambling regulation.
The licensed operator committed a serious infringement of the type listed in article 40 of Law 13/2011 on gambling regulation.
The licensed operator committed a serious infringement of the type listed in article 40 of Law 13/2011 on gambling regulation.
The company promoted gambling operators that are not licensed in Spain through affiliate marketing links and commercial communications on social networks.
The foreign online gambling operator offered gambling in Spain without holding a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The licensed operator committed a serious infringement of the type listed in article 40 of Law 13/2011 on gambling regulation.
The licensed interactive gaming manufacturer failed to obtain Board approval before a change of control.
The casino operator failed to protect assets in connection with a theft of money by an employee.
The company offered gambling to Swedish players without holding the required Swedish licence.
The association's lottery website failed to display required information, including the minimum age limit for gambling, breaching rules on responsible gambling and information duties.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensees failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to their board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensees failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to their board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes to its board and/or management within the required 14 days.
The rapper known as Capital Bra repeatedly streamed and promoted participation in unlicensed online gambling on his social media channels, ran banner advertising for such sites and operated a comparison page for illegal operators, which is prohibited advertising for illegal gambling.
Read case →Karlholms GoIF failed to notify Spelinspektionen of several changes in its circle of key persons within the required 14 days.
The casino failed to adhere to its Plan Prohibiting Harassment and Discrimination.
The operator failed to make required information, such as the licence holder's contact details and responsible gambling information, easily accessible in its bingo hall Idrottens Bingo in Linköping.
Prime Sports was penalized for violating New Jersey sports wagering rules.
DraftKings was penalized for violating New Jersey sports wagering rules.
BetMGM lacked sufficient procedures, including Know-Your-Customer protocols, to prevent fraud rings from creating and funding multiple accounts using other people's personal identifying information and stolen or fraudulently obtained payment devices.
The Director imposed a civil penalty on Borgata for violating casino surveillance rules.
The company offered gambling to Swedish consumers without holding the required Swedish gambling licence.
The MGA cancelled the company's B2C authorisation and imposed administrative penalties because of numerous shortcomings in breach of the Gaming Act and its regulatory instruments, along with unpaid licence fees and compliance contributions.
Administrative penalties were imposed because of the company's numerous shortcomings in contravention of the Gaming Act and the regulatory instruments issued thereunder.
The operator's confirmations of gambling subscriptions sold by telephone and the form of customers' acceptance did not meet the legal requirements for distance contracts concluded by phone.
Those responsible for the website dracula.casino offered gambling targeting Sweden without holding the required Swedish licence.
ATG breached the anti-money-laundering rules, and the courts confirmed a warning and a financial sanction.
The company supplied gaming software to operators that lacked the required Swedish gambling licence.
The casino allowed self-excluded individuals to enter the gaming floor and gamble on seven occasions.
The casino permitted a person under the age of 21 to access the gaming floor and gamble.
The licensed Internet Gaming Manufacturer completed a change of control before obtaining Board approval.
Hard Rock Digital violated rules governing internet gaming promotions.
PointsBet allegedly failed systematically to monitor, detect, document and report suspicious betting patterns linked to the 2024 Jontay Porter NBA bet-rigging scheme, and initially told the AGCO it had not offered such bets.
The operator violated self-exclusion rules protecting excluded patrons.
The casino was penalized for a sports wagering violation cited in a Notice of Violation.
The internet gaming operator violated self-exclusion rules protecting excluded patrons.
The Swedish website displayed marketing banners promoting gambling offered without a Swedish licence.
The Swedish website displayed marketing banners promoting gambling offered without a Swedish licence.
The operator's gambling websites lacked required information, including the licence holder's telephone number and email address on the home pages and information about the risks associated with gambling for money.
Penn Sports Interactive was penalised under a Notice of Violation concerning software rules.
Golden Nugget failed to comply with sports wagering regulations concerning patron identification.
The company offered gambling to Swedish players without holding the required Swedish licence.
FanDuel failed to identify, respond to and report unusual and suspicious betting activity indicating possible match-fixing on Czech Table Tennis Star Series matches.
Harrah's was fined for failing to comply with rules governing chip fills.
William Hill was fined for failing to comply with sports wagering rules.
Spelinspektionen had issued a warning and a sanction fee because it considered the association had conducted bingo gaming in premises that were not a bingo hall and therefore not covered by its licence, but the administrative court overturned that decision.
Spelinspektionen had issued a warning and a sanction fee because it considered the association had conducted bingo gaming in premises that were not a bingo hall and therefore not covered by its licence, but the administrative court overturned that decision.
The four licensees failed to meet social responsibility and customer interaction requirements, with systems that were not sensitive enough to detect indicators of gambling harm in time.
The operator failed to meet the information requirements for licensees' websites, including making contact details and responsible gambling information easily accessible.
The operator failed to meet the information requirements for licensees' websites, including making contact details and responsible gambling information easily accessible.
The operator failed to meet the information requirements for licensees' websites and was ordered to correct the shortcomings.
The operator failed to meet the information requirements for licensees' websites, including making contact details and responsible gambling information easily accessible.
The operator failed to meet the information requirements for licensees' websites, including making contact details and responsible gambling information easily accessible.
The operator failed to meet the information requirements for licensees' websites, including making contact details and responsible gambling information easily accessible.
The licensed interactive gaming manufacturer failed to timely file a Principal License application for a board member who took on additional responsibilities.
The company offered gambling to Swedish consumers without holding a Swedish licence.
Sporttrade accepted wagers on sports events that are prohibited for wagering in New Jersey.
The Commission found anti-money laundering and social responsibility failures, including inability to assess customer spend and money laundering risk on B3 gaming machines, no effective financial sanctions policy, source of income thresholds set too high and not risk based, and inadequate customer interactions.
DraftKings was penalized for violating multiple rules governing sports wagering.
The operator's website lacked mandatory information such as a telephone number, e-mail address, company registration number, licence period and information about the risks of gambling for money, and the telephone contact function was still not corrected.
The operator offered online gambling in Spain without a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The operator allowed access to gambling by persons who are prohibited from playing, used non-certified or unauthorised technical systems, and breached the technical requirements of the regulations on software and communication systems.
The operator failed to comply with its legal obligations on responsible gambling and player protection.
The operator offered online gambling in Spain without a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The operator breached the technical requirements of the regulations on software and communication systems and used technical systems that were not certified or authorised.
The operator offered online gambling in Spain without a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The operator failed to comply with the technical requirements of the regulations on gaming software and communication systems.
The operator offered online gambling in Spain without a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The operator failed to comply with the technical requirements of the regulations on gaming software and communication systems.
The operator offered online gambling in Spain without a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The operator offered online gambling in Spain without a Spanish licence, a very serious infringement.
The company offered gambling to Swedish consumers without holding the required Swedish gambling licence.
The Commission suspended the operator's licence amid concerns of suspected social responsibility and anti-money laundering failings, activities inconsistent with the licensing objectives and licence conditions, and possible unsuitability to carry on licensed activities.
The Commission found the operator had ineffective anti-money laundering controls and social responsibility systems, including deposit limits that failed in practice and over-reliance on an automated risk-scoring algorithm.
One of the operator's websites lacked the required responsible-gambling logotypes linking to self-test, deposit/login-time limits and self-exclusion.
The establishment repeatedly failed to have a Board-certified employee physically present supervising the VGT area while the terminals were available for play.
The Board revoked the establishment and individual principal licences after finding failures to maintain suitability, including no credentialed employee on duty, allowing a minor to be present in the VGT area and wager, and failing to meet qualified truck stop diesel sales requirements.
WSI agreed to a settlement with the Director over unspecified sports wagering violations.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen within 14 days of several changes to its circle of key persons (board members).
The Commission found anti-money laundering and social responsibility failures, plus inaccurate regulatory returns, at NetBet Enterprises Limited.
The company offered gambling targeting Swedish players without holding the required Swedish gambling licence.
The Commission suspended the operator's licence over reasonable belief that it failed to maintain and implement effective anti-money laundering policies, procedures and controls, and over serious concerns about its governance, decision-making and response to money laundering and terrorist financing risks.
The Commission suspended Spribe OÜ's gambling software operating licence on suitability grounds because of serious non-compliance with the hosting requirements of the licensing framework, including hosting activity without a suitable hosting licence.
The company offered gambling to Swedish players without holding the required Swedish gambling licence.
The Gambling Commission found the operator had anti-money laundering and social responsibility failings, including inadequate customer interaction with players showing markers of harm and weaknesses in its money laundering risk assessment and due diligence.
The casino allowed an involuntarily excluded person to access the gaming floor and gamble.
The casino allowed a compromised deck of cards to be used in table game play.
The VGT establishment operated terminals without Board-credentialed employees on duty and allowed persons under 21 to access the VGT room, with minors operating machines on two occasions.
The company failed to comply with the Swedish anti-money-laundering act's requirements on customer due diligence and handling of customers, which the court found to be serious breaches.
The operator was penalised for violations of self-exclusion requirements, allowing self-excluded patrons to gamble.
The operator allegedly failed to identify and respond to clear signs of a patron's high-risk gambling, relying on self-assessments instead of meaningful responsible gambling due diligence or intervention.
Some of the operator's online slot games breached the Commission's Remote Technical Standards by failing to display the customer's net position and by celebrating returns that were less than or equal to the total stake gambled.
The operator failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes in its circle of key persons within the required 14 days.
The operator failed to notify the regulator of changes in its circle of key persons within the required 14 days.
SuperBook was penalized under an Action in Lieu of Complaint in connection with sports wagers it sought to have voided, and its request to void those wagers was denied.
The licensee failed to notify the regulator of changes in its circle of key persons within the required 14 days.
The licensee failed to notify the regulator of changes in its circle of persons (key persons) within the 14 days required by law.
The licensee failed to notify Spelinspektionen of changes in its circle of key persons within the 14-day deadline required by the Swedish Gambling Act.
The licensee failed to notify the regulator of changes in its circle of key persons within the 14-day deadline required by the Swedish Gambling Act.
PRO Ragunda failed to notify the regulator of changes in its circle of key persons within the 14-day deadline.
The licensee failed to notify the regulator of changes in its circle of persons (key persons) within the 14 days required by law.
The licensee failed to notify the regulator of changes in its circle of persons (key persons) within the required 14 days.
No actions match that filter.