Industry news · jurisdiction analysis
Breaking regulatory changes, side-by-side jurisdiction comparisons, and plain-English analysis of every rulebook we index. What just shifted, what it means for licensed operators, and which provision to cite when. Written by people who read the standards before they wrote about them.
Compliance officers and AML teams at UKGC- and MGA-licensed operators need to understand trigger thresholds, defensible evidence standards, and record-keeping obligations for source of funds checks. This article maps the regulatory framework and recent enforcement learnings.
B2C licensees holding MGA authorisations must meet specific player protection obligations under Directive 2 of 2018 (V3, January 2023), covering deposit limit frameworks, reality check mechanics, gambling history disclosures, and problem gambling detection. This article sets out the operational requirements and implementation considerations compliance teams need to address.
Multi-brand operators face a structural conflict between the responsible gambling imperative to maintain a unified view of player behaviour and GDPR's purpose limitation and data minimisation principles. This article maps the lawful basis options, architecture trade-offs, and regulatory expectations from the UKGC and MGA.
Compliance officers and licensing teams operating across multiple jurisdictions need a clear picture of how mandatory cross-operator self-exclusion registers differ in scope, technical integration, and B2B liability. This article compares the UK, Denmark, Sweden, and Germany frameworks at the regulatory text level.
SIFS 2026:3 establishes the binding technical and procedural framework Swedish licensees must follow when querying the Spelpaus national self-exclusion register, with all five provisions taking effect 1 August 2026.
Compliance officers entering Canada's regulated online gaming market must navigate two distinct provincial frameworks. This article maps the structural, operational, and responsible gambling differences between AGCO's Ontario regime and AGLC's Alberta regime.
Compliance teams across licensed iGaming operations routinely misconfigure their ISO/IEC 27001 implementations, treating certification as a point-in-time exercise rather than a functioning ISMS. This article examines the most consequential mistakes, how they map to UKGC and MGA regulatory obligations, and what auditors are actually testing for.